Minette bodies and cognate mica-clinopyroxenite xenoliths from the Milk River area, southern Alberta: records of a complex history of the northernmost part of the Archean Wyoming craton
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Minettes exposed in southern Alberta near the Milk River are the northern outliers of the Eocene Sweet Grass Hills igneous complex of the Montana alkalic igneous province. These minettes often contain coarse-grained xenoliths of phlogopite + clinopyroxene ± apatite. The parent magmas of the minettes were generated at pressures [Formula: see text]17 kbar in equilibrium with clinopyroxene + phlogopite ± olivine. Fractional crystallization and mixing provided a spectrum of evolved minettes and cumulates, the latter of which were sampled by subsequent minette magmas as xenoliths. Two xenoliths were dated at 49.0 ± 0.8 Ma and 52 ± 1.7 Ma. The host dyke of the latter xenolith gave an age of 50 ± 0.3 Ma. The minettes and their xenoliths have overlapping values of 87Sr/86Sri, εNdT, 206Pb/204Pb, 207Pb/204Pb, and 208Pb/204Pb, similar to those of alkaline igneous rocks from farther south in the Montana alkalic igneous province. The Sweet Grass Hills lie north of the Great Falls Tectonic Zone, previously interpreted as a Proterozoic suture zone separating the Archean Medicine Hat block from the Archean Wyoming craton to the south. Geochemical data for the Milk River minettes provide evidence for a history of the mantle underneath the Medicine Hat block, similar to that found previously for mantle-derived rocks of the Wyoming craton, including a significant Proterozoic mantle enrichment event. Given this similarity, we suggest that the Wyoming craton extends into southern Alberta, and that the Great Falls Tectonic Zone does not represent a Proterozoic suture of two Archean blocks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".