Considerations for the provision of prosthetic services in post-disaster contexts: the Haiti Amputee Coalition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Following the 2010 earthquake, Hôpital Albert Schweitzer and Hanger Prosthetics founded a prosthetics shop in rural Haiti. This research explored barriers to clients’ continued use of their limb, with the goal of improving programming and thus increasing rates of success. Methods used included ethnographic observation, semi-structured interviews and focus groups. The participants included retrospective and prospective prosthetic users as well as in-house clients. Data were collected from over 100 individuals. Despite gratitude for the services, many clients reported they did not utilize their limbs on a daily basis and provided insightful critiques to the programme and suggestions for improvement. Lack of clear communication with the clients was a major problem in the programme. Clients expressed gratitude for the sense of community within the programme but noted the lack of outreach after discharge. Other important concerns were programme sustainability and the provision of more holistic care for individuals with disabilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it