Review: cognitive behaviour therapy is beneficial in children with anxiety disorders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cartwright-Hatton S, Roberts C, Chitsabesan P, et al . Systematic review of the efficacy of cognitive behaviour therapies for childhood and adolescent anxiety disorders. Br J Clin Psychol 2004;43:421–36.[OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3][Web of Science][4] Q What are the effects of cognitive behaviour therapy in children with anxiety disorder? ### ![Graphic][5]</img>Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis. ### ![Graphic][6]</img>Data sources: Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Current Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, National Technical Information Service, Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings (ISI Web of Science). Hand search of reference lists of recent reviews and trials, journals that had published trials identified by previous stage or that were known to publish trials on treatment of anxiety disorders. Experts in the field were asked to provide any trials that had not been identified by the previous stages (search date 2003). ### ![Graphic][7]</img>Study selection and analysis: Randomised controlled trials … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DThe%2BBritish%2Bjournal%2Bof%2Bclinical%2Bpsychology%2B%252F%2Bthe%2BBritish%2BPsychological%2BSociety%26rft.stitle%253DBr%2BJ%2BClin%2BPsychol%26rft.aulast%253DCartwright-Hatton%26rft.auinit1%253DS.%26rft.volume%253D43%26rft.issue%253DPt%2B4%26rft.spage%253D421%26rft.epage%253D436%26rft.atitle%253DSystematic%2Breview%2Bof%2Bthe%2Befficacy%2Bof%2Bcognitive%2Bbehaviour%2Btherapies%2Bfor%2Bchildhood%2Band%2Badolescent%2Banxiety%2Bdisorders.%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1348%252F0144665042388928%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F15530212%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1348/0144665042388928&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=15530212&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febmental%2F8%2F3%2F77.atom [4]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000225432900007&link_type=ISI [5]: /embed/inline-graphic-1.gif [6]: /embed/inline-graphic-2.gif [7]: /embed/inline-graphic-3.gif
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".