MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016257799 · doi:10.1029/2005gl022983

Near‐Earth breakup triggered by the earthward traveling burst flow

2005· article· en· W2016257799 on OpenAlexafffund
I. Voronkov

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBreakupPhysicsMagnetic fieldConvectionGeophysicsPlasma sheetPlasmaNonlinear systemLeading edgeComputational physicsMechanicsMagnetosphere

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Computer modeling is performed in order to explore a hypothesis stating that the near‐Earth breakup can be triggered by a pulse of convection traveling earthward from the more distant magnetotail. The following possible scenario for the interaction of the burst with the near‐Earth edge of the plasma sheet (PS) is revealed. The near‐dipolar magnetic field topology of the inner PS leads to the flow breaking which in turn launches a wide spectrum of dispersive compressional waves propagating further Earthward. Strong topological variations of the magnetic field at the inner edge of the PS, required by the equilibrium conditions, play a role of the resonant cavity for selected compressional modes. Growing resonance modes provide a ponderomotive force pumping up corresponding nonlinear ballooning eigenmodes. The latter extract energy stored in the inner PS and produce vortical structures expanding tailward.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207