MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016285300 · doi:10.1080/03601234.2014.882161

Estrone and 17β-estradiol mineralization in liquid swine manure and soil in the presence and absence of penicillin or tetracycline

2014· article· en· W2016285300 on OpenAlexaff
Karin P. Rose, Annemieke Farenhorst

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Science and Health Part B · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsManureMineralization (soil science)ChemistrySoil waterTetracyclinePenicillinAnimal scienceEstroneAmendmentEnvironmental chemistryAntibioticsAgronomyBiologyEcologyBiochemistryHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Natural steroid estrogens (e.g., 17 β-estradiol) and antibiotics (e.g., penicillin) are chemicals detected in livestock manure storage facilities and in manure-amended agricultural soils. The fate of natural steroid estrogens in these media has been studied for the past two decades but seldom in association with antibiotics. This factorial experiment examined estrone (E1) and 17 β-estradiol (E2) mineralization in liquid swine manure, soil and manure-amended soil containing 0, 40 and 200 mg kg−1 penicillin or tetracycline. Maximum mineralization (MAX) across treatments ranged from 13.5% to 49.9% for E1 and from 15.4% to 51.2% for E2. Estrogen mineralization almost always significantly decreased in the order of: manure > soil amended with a low rate of manure = soil > soil amended with a high rate of manure, suggesting that periodically agitated manure was a more favorable medium for biotic removal of estrogens than soil. Both rates of tetracycline in manure induces a lag phase of 40 to 50 days prior to the onset of a log phase of mineralization, and tetracycline at 200 mg kg−1 significantly decreased E1 and E2 MAX in manure. For soils amended with a high rate of manure, penicillin at 200 mg kg−1 significantly decreased E1 and E2 MAX and also the other antibiotic additions resulted in numerically lesser E1 and E2 MAX values, relative to soils free of antibiotics. We conclude that storage of liquid swine manure for 3 to 4 months with periodic agitation prior to application to agricultural land may reduce the potential for estrogens to become environmental contaminants, but that the persistence of estrogens in manure storage lagoons is also influenced by farm management practices such as the types and rates of antibiotics administered to livestock. When both estrogens and antibiotics are present in manure applied to soils, estrogens may have slower dissipation rates in soil particularly when manure is applied at high rates or not mechanically incorporated in the surface horizon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Science and Health Part BSame topicPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsFrench-language works237,207