MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016310787 · doi:10.4161/cc.4.10.2106

Spindle Checkpoint Maintenance Requires Ame1 and Okp1

2005· article· en· W2016310787 on OpenAlexaff
Isabelle Pot, James Knockleby, Victoria Aneliunas, Thao T. T. Nguyen, Sonia Ah-Kye, Gregory Liszt, M Snyder, Philip Hieter, Jackie Vogel

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Cycle · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyG2-M DNA damage checkpointSpindle checkpointCell cycle checkpointCell biologyCHEK1Computational biologyCell cycleGeneticsSpindle apparatusCancerCell divisionCell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kinetochore proteins are required for high fidelity chromosome segregation and as a platform for checkpoint signaling. Ame1 is an essential component of the COMA (Ctf19, Okp1, Mcm21, Ame1) sub-complex of the central kinetochore of budding yeast. In this study, we describe the isolation and characterization of an Ame1 conditional mutant, ame1-4. ame1-4 cells exhibit chromosome segregation defects and Mad2-dependent cell cycle delay similar to okp1-5 cells. However, the viability of ame1-4 cells is markedly reduced relative to wild type and okp1-5 cells after three hours at restrictive temperature. To determine if ame1-4 cells enter anaphase with mis-segregated chromosomes, we monitored the localization of Bub3:VFP as a marker for anaphase onset. ame1-4 cells containing mis-segregated sister chromatids initially accumulate Bub3:VFP at kinetochores, indicating checkpoint activation and a metaphase arrest. Subsequently, Bub3:VFP de-localizes and cells reinitiate DNA duplication and budding without cytokinesis in the presence of un-segregated chromosomes. Overexpression of OKP1 in ame1-4 cells restores ame1-4 protein localization and a stable arrest. Based on our results, we propose that Ame1 and Okp1 are required for a sustained checkpoint arrest in the presence of mis-segregated chromosomes. Our results suggest that checkpoint response might be controlled not only at the level of activation but also via signals that ensure maintenance of the response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell CycleSame topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsFrench-language works237,207