Bailey & Scott’s Diagnostic Microbiology, 13<sup>th</sup>Edn
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Edited by Patricia M. Tille, PhD, MLS(ASCP) 1056 pages. St. Louis: Mosby, Inc, 2014. $124.00. ISBN: 978-0-323-08330-0 The 13th edition of Bailey & Scott’s Diagnostic Microbiology is a comprehensive textbook of clinical microbiology that will serve as an excellent resource for students, technologists, and practicing clinical microbiologists. Each chapter follows a consistent format, starting with objectives and including figures, tables, and a short set of pertinent references at the end of each chapter. The new editor, Dr Patricia M. Tille, is the program director of the Department of Medical Laboratory Science of South Dakota State University in Brookings. Her preface effectively lays out the new material in this edition, setting the tone for what to expect and emphasizing that many changes have been made based on the comments of past reviewers. Tille and her contributors have done a terrific job in trying to meet the needs of readers and reviewers alike. In terms of how it is organized, the book thoroughly covers all of clinical microbiology using the traditional breakdown of chapters into various organism groups (parts III-VIs); however, it also includes a part VII that provides …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it