MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2016325397 · doi:10.1309/lm5jc0ph0oggbszz

Bailey &amp; Scott’s Diagnostic Microbiology, 13<sup>th</sup>Edn

2013· article· en· W2016325397 sur OpenAlexaff
Gerri S. Hall

Notice bibliographique

RevueLaboratory Medicine · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Établissements canadiensCanadian Society of Microbiologists
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésClinical microbiologyLibrary scienceArt historyMedicineHistoryComputer scienceMicrobiologyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The 13th edition of Bailey & Scott’s Diagnostic Microbiology is a comprehensive textbook of clinical microbiology that will serve as an excellent resource for students, technologists, and practicing clinical microbiologists. Each chapter follows a consistent format, starting with objectives and including figures, tables, and a short set of pertinent references at the end of each chapter. The new editor, Dr Patricia M. Tille, is the program director of the Department of Medical Laboratory Science of South Dakota State University in Brookings. Her preface effectively lays out the new material in this edition, setting the tone for what to expect and emphasizing that many changes have been made based on the comments of past reviewers. Tille and her contributors have done a terrific job in trying to meet the needs of readers and reviewers alike. In terms of how it is organized, the book thoroughly covers all of clinical microbiology using the traditional breakdown of chapters into various organism groups (parts III-VIs); however, it also includes a part VII that provides information grouped by organ systems. Some textbooks use either of these groupings but not both; because this book is targeted to students, technologists, and practicing microbiologists, it is advantageous to all readers that information is available both ways. Again, the editor and contributors have done a strong job of trying to meet the needs of many different types of readers. The graphics are excellent—beautiful figures, pictures, and graphs provide a visual depiction of the information contained in the text. Many new graphics have been included in this edition; strong graphics from previous editions are also included. One exception to the excellent quality graphics is the series of microscopic slides of Nocardia spp presented in the chapter on aerobic actinomycetes; the book could have provided much better examples of the Gram and modified acid-fast bacillus (AFB) stains. Case studies are presented in most chapters and are an excellent new feature of this edition. These studies include questions at the end, which is always a helpful tool for learners at all levels. These questions are also useful for competency testing in clinical microbiology laboratories and for teaching medical students and residents during lab rounds. They add a great deal of information and help to complete the contents of the chapters. The taxonomy presented in the book is up to date. The tables that detail all types of specimens and how to process them are informative. The inclusion of chapters on lab safety and lab management is helpful; also, placing the table of contents in the front binder is ingenious because it provides easy look-up of chapters for those in a hurry while giving enough information to be complete. The glossary at the end is extremely thorough and provides definitions of terms used in the text. The index is extensive and complete, allowing for easy look-up of topics. Despite its strong points, the book has certain drawbacks. Although the enhanced chapter on molecular techniques is well written, there is an insufficient amount of discussion about use of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) for identification of many organisms. This technique is mentioned only briefly in chapter 7 and again briefly in the mycology chapter on hyaline molds. Many articles have been published about MALDITOF; these should have been introduced and discussed. This edition of the book, like previous editions, places too much emphasis on biochemicals for identification of organisms. This is particularly the case for organisms such as the actinomycetes and Mycobacterium spp, for which biochemical testing methods need to be de-emphasized and molecular methods and mass spectrophotometry discussed at greater length. To be fair to the authors, they comment in the chapter on mycobacteria that a combination of molecular and phenotypic identification will be necessary for complete identification. However, this point should be emphasized throughout the text, with references given to provide further information for readers. Dr Tille explains in the preface that an attempt was made to reduce the size of chapters and to break down topics into smaller segments. However, the book now contains too many subdivisions of chapters on topics such as the nonfermenter substances. Many rarely isolated and not necessarily clinically relevant organisms are discussed in the space of an entire chapter. In contrast, the chapter on aerobic atinomycetes, especially Nocardia spp, does not discuss these important entities at sufficient length. Likewise, Clostridium difficile is given only a small section in the chapter on anaerobes. Also, the authors should have provided some guidance on algorithms that can be used in the lab that are not entirely based on enzyme immunoassays. In the next edition, I suggest inclusion of a reference to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) documents in the chapter on mycology antifungal susceptibility, the chapter on mycoplasma, and other areas in which the topics for which these documents would be helpful are discussed. These sources are valuable; readers need to be made aware of them. Despite its few shortcomings, this edition of the classic textbook for clinical microbiologists helps to maintain the well-reputed names of Bailey and Scott and provides a meaningful addition to the library of the clinical microbiologist.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,094
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,313

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0040,003
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0940,101

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,251
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations35
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueLaboratory MedicineMême sujetBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingTravaux en français237 207