MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Distinctions between phytoplasmas at the subgroup level detected by heteroduplex mobility assay

2005· article· en· W2016362067 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Pathology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhytoplasmaAster yellowsBiologyLeafhopperHeteroduplexGenetic diversityPolymerase chain reactionVirologyBotanyVeterinary medicineRestriction fragment length polymorphismGeneticsGenePopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A total of 62 phytoplasma isolates were collected from North America, Europe and Asia and analysed by heteroduplex mobility assay (HMA) of the 16/23S spacer region amplified by the polymerase chain reaction. The results revealed wide genetic diversity among the phytoplasmas studied and a number of new phytoplasma strains were identified from known or new plant hosts in Alberta, Canada. Two distinctive subgroups were revealed by HMA in phytoplasmas associated with canola yellows, Chinese aster yellows, dandelion yellows and monarda yellows. In Alberta, two subgroups of the aster yellows group of phytoplasmas, I‐A and I‐B, were prevalent in naturally infected field crops and ornamentals in open gardens. The results indicated that HMA is a simple, but rapid and accurate, alternative method for the detection and estimation of genetic divergence of phytoplasmas when finer molecular characterization of phytoplasmas is required at the subgroup level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score0.813

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it