MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016397025 · doi:10.1353/ajm.2005.0035

Non-abelian zeta functions for function fields

2005· article· en· W2016397025 on OpenAlexaff
Lin Weng

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Mathematics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic Number Theory Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsMathematicsAbelian groupPure mathematicsArithmetic zeta functionRiemann zeta function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we initiate a geometrically oriented construction of non-abelian zeta functions for curves defined over finite fields. More precisely, we first introduce new yet genuine non-abelian zeta functions for curves defined over finite fields, by a "weighted count" on rational points over the corresponding moduli spaces of semi-stable vector bundles using moduli interpretation of these points. Then we define non-abelian L -functions for curves over finite fields using integrations of Eisenstein series associated to L 2 -automorphic forms over certain generalized moduli spaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of MathematicsSame topicAnalytic Number Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207