Phasic bursts in rat magnocellular neurosecretory cells are not intrinsically regenerative <i>in vivo</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vasopressinergic hypothalamic magnocellular neurosecretory cells fire in phasic bursts. Burst initiation involves summation of postsynaptic potentials to generate action potentials. Action potentials are each followed by a nonsynaptic depolarizing after-potential that summates temporally to generate a plateau potential and so sustain activity throughout the burst. It is unknown whether this plateau potential exceeds spike threshold in vivo to cause intrinsic regenerative firing or simply approaches threshold to increase the probability that excitatory postsynaptic potentials will trigger further action potentials. Here we show that pharmacological blockade of ionotropic glutamatergic transmission by microdialysis application of kynurenic acid into the supraoptic nucleus of anaesthetized rats prevents spontaneous bursts and bursts (after-discharge) evoked by short trains of antidromically stimulated action potentials in magnocellular neurosecretory cells. Even during prolonged depolarization induced by 1 m NaCl infusion, kynurenic acid microdialysis application still blocked after-discharge. The ability of kynurenic acid to block after-discharge during osmotic stimulation was not caused by an unmasking of inhibitory postsynaptic potentials as kynurenic acid was equally effective in the presence of the ionotropic gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor antagonist, bicuculline, nor did it result from inhibition of plateau potential amplitude as this was unaffected by kynurenic acid and bicuculline in vitro, as was after-discharge evoked in vitro. We conclude that phasic bursts are nonregenerative in vivo but rather require continued excitatory synaptic input activity superimposed upon a subthreshold plateau potential to sustain burst activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".