MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016415823 · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2007.06.016

CT (ISO-C-3D) image based computer assisted navigation in trauma surgery: A preliminary report

2007· article· en· W2016415823 on OpenAlexaff
Kıvanç Ateşok, Joel Finkelstein, Amal Khoury, Meir Liebergall, R. Mosheiff

Bibliographic record

VenueInjury Extra · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPelvic and Acetabular Injuries
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineReduction (mathematics)Computer-assisted surgeryFracture reductionFixation (population genetics)SurgeryInternal fixationAcetabulumNavigation systemArtificial intelligenceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CT (ISO-C-3D) image based navigation has recently been introduced to improve the image quality and accuracy during computer assisted orthopaedic surgeries. We report on our early experience using this novel technique in intra-articular lower extremity fracture management. Real time CT-based navigation assisted surgery was used in the treatment of five patients with fractures of tibial plateau (3), talus (1) and acetabulum (1). The mean age was 38 years (range, 29–47). Feasibility, pitfalls and adequacy of reduction and fixation were evaluated. Additional time spent before the surgical incision (Δ time) using the ISO-C navigation and total operative time was measured. All five procedures were regarded as technically successful. Accurate reduction and fixation of all the fractures was achieved. All the fractures were fixed with closed reduction and internal cannulated screw fixation. Mean additional time spent after the start of anaesthesia and until surgical incision for cannulated screw insertion (Δ time) was 26 min. The average total operative time was 109 min. Combining the ISO-C-3D images with computer navigation can improve the safety and decrease the invasiveness of the procedures in trauma surgery. 3D navigation makes the reduction and screw placement highly accurate but may extend the operative time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.703
Threshold uncertainty score0.830

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInjury ExtraSame topicPelvic and Acetabular InjuriesFrench-language works237,207