MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016458286 · doi:10.1002/art.38422

A11: Assessment of Radiographic Progression in Patients With Polyarticular‐Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Treated With Tocilizumab: 2‐Year Data From CHERISH

2014· article· en· W2016458286 on OpenAlexaff
Angelo Ravelli, Nicolino Ruperto, Silvia Pederzoli, Rubén Burgos‐Vargas, Katarzyna Kobusińska, Heinrike Schmeling, Flávio Sztajnbok, Frank Weller‐Heinemann, Елена Жолобова, Francesco Zulian, Roger C. Allen, Jeffrey Chaitow, Caroline Keane, Chris Wells, Alberto Martini, Daniel J. Lovell, Fabrizio De Benedetti

Bibliographic record

VenueArthritis & Rheumatology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTocilizumabMedicineJuvenileArthritisRadiographyInternal medicineSurgeryRheumatoid arthritisBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Purpose: The phase 3 CHERISH trial demonstrated the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ), an interleukin‐6 receptor inhibitor, in patients with polyarticular‐course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pcJIA). This analysis investigated the progression of radiographic joint damage in patients with pcJIA treated with TCZ for up to 104 weeks in CHERISH. Methods: Patients 2 to 17 years old with ≥6 months' active pcJIA for whom methotrexate failed received open‐label (OL) TCZ according to body weight (BW) (BW ≥30 kg, 8 mg/kg [n = 119]; BW <30 kg, randomly assigned 1:1 to 8 mg/kg [n = 34] or 10 mg/kg [n = 35]) every 4 weeks for 16 weeks. At 16 weeks, eligible patients (≥JIA ACR30 response) entered a 24‐week, randomized, double‐blind withdrawal period and were assigned 1:1 to placebo or continued TCZ. All patients entered an OL extension through week 104. Those receiving TCZ in all 3 parts were included in the continuous TCZ subgroup for which key radiographic end points were assessed. Radiographic progression was indicated as a positive change in adapted Sharp/van der Heijde score () (aSH) and/or a negative change in Poznanski score (), assessed on hand and wrist radiographs, from baseline to weeks 52 and 104. Results: Baseline and ≥1 postbaseline aSH and Poznanski scores were available for 45 and 35 patients, respectively, in the continuous TCZ subgroup and for 87 and 61 patients, respectively, in the total population. Reasons for missing data included early withdrawal, no consent, or unreadable radiographs (because of advanced damage resulting in unreliable measurements or growth plate fusion in postpubertal children), preventing assessment of Poznanski scores. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were balanced for aSH and Poznanski populations and were similar to those for the full study population. At weeks 52 and 104, median changes from baseline aSH score of 0.5 ( p = 0.70) and −1.0 ( p = 0.11), respectively, and median changes from baseline Poznanski score of 0.3 ( p = 0.07) and 0.6 ( p = 0.004), respectively, indicating a lack of radiographic progression. With a cutoff of the smallest detectable difference, no radiographic progression was seen in 87.5% and 97.1% of patients based on aSH scoring and 93.5% and 96.0% of patients based on Poznanski scoring at weeks 52 and 104, respectively. Comparable proportions of the total radiographic population, including those exposed to placebo, remained radiographic progression free at week 104. Among the radiographic population, the annualized rates of progression to week 104 for aSH and Poznanski scores were 0.00 and 0.18, respectively. Conclusion: TCZ halted the progression of radiographic damage, leaving a large majority of pcJIA patients free of radiographic progression after 2 years of treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArthritis & RheumatologySame topicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207