Chicken or the Egg: Anorexia Nervosa and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Children and Adolescents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) frequently has neuropsychiatric involvement including affective disorders, psychosis, and cognitive dysfunction. Evidence suggests that anorexia nervosa (AN) in adolescents with SLE may be triggered by steroid-induced changes in weight and body shape. We propose that AN may be another manifestation of neuropsychiatric SLE and should be considered in this patient population. A retrospective chart review identified 7 children/adolescents diagnosed with SLE and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition diagnostic criteria for AN, restrictive subtype, at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto between January 1989 and January 2011. One patient developed AN 15 months after being diagnosed with SLE that was attributed to prednisone-induced weight gain and cushingoid appearance. Of the remaining 6 patients, the median age at onset of AN symptoms was 12.2 years and diagnosis of AN was 13.6 years. The median age at SLE diagnosis was 14.2 years with median time after onset of AN symptoms of 20 months (7.5-32 months). All patients had evidence of joint symptoms and a positive antinuclear antibody, and 50% had lymphopenia at the time of SLE diagnosis. Treatment of SLE resulted in improvement of AN in all patients. The timing of the clinical presentation of AN in relation to the diagnosis of SLE and response to SLE treatment suggests that AN may be a novel presentation of neuropsychiatric SLE. Patients with AN who present with or develop joint symptoms, a positive antinuclear antibody, or lymphopenia should be investigated and followed for possible SLE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".