MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016523223 · doi:10.1067/mcp.2000.112363

Effect of ketoconazole on ritonavir and saquinavir concentrations in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid from patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus

2000· article· en· W2016523223 on OpenAlexaff
Yasmin Khaliq

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSaquinavirKetoconazoleRitonavirPharmacokineticsMedicineConfidence intervalPharmacologyCerebrospinal fluidInternal medicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)ImmunologyViral loadAntiretroviral therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIM: Our aim was to evaluate the effect of ketoconazole on ritonavir and saquinavir plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations. METHODS: Twelve patients who were human immunodeficiency virus-seropositive and who were receiving 400 mg of ritonavir and 400 mg of saquinavir twice daily completed a nonfasted, two-period, two-group, longitudinal pharmacokinetic study. Blood samples were collected over the daytime 12-hour dosing interval of the protease inhibitors at baseline (period 1, day 0) and after 10 days of coadministration of 200 mg (n = 6) or 400 mg (n = 6) of ketoconazole once daily (period 2, day 10). One set of paired CSF and blood samples was collected between 4 and 5 hours after the dose on both days. RESULTS: Ketoconazole significantly increased area under the plasma concentration-time curve, plasma concentration at 12 hours after the dose, and half-life of ritonavir by 29% (95% confidence interval (CI), 13%-46%), 62% (95% CI, 37%-92%), and 31% (95% CI, 13%-51%), respectively. Similar increases of 37% (95% CI, 4%-81%), 94% (95% CI, 41%-167%), and 38% (95% CI, 15%-66%), respectively, were observed for these parameters for saquinavir. Ketoconazole significantly elevated ritonavir CSF concentration by 178% (95% CI, 59%-385%), from 2.4 to 6.6 ng/mL, with no change in paired unbound plasma level (26 ng/mL); this led to a commensurate 181% increase (95% CI, 47%-437%) in CSF/plasma unbound ratio. All pharmacokinetic changes were unrelated to ketoconazole dose or plasma exposures. Corresponding changes for saquinavir CSF pharmacokinetics were insignificant (P > .06); saquinavir CSF levels were unmeasurable in 7 patients (<0.2 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: The disproportionate increase in CSF compared with plasma concentrations of ritonavir is consistent with ketoconazole inhibiting both drug efflux from CSF and systemic clearance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.627

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations84
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Pharmacology & TherapeuticsSame topicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentFrench-language works237,207