Effects of statins on myocardial and coronary artery response to ischemia-reperfusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study tested the hypotheses that (i) lipophilic statins (atorvastatin and simvastatin) impair ventricular recovery from myocardial ischemia-reperfusion, owing to their greater myocyte permeability, compared with a hydrophilic statin (pravastatin), and (ii) statins enhance endothelium-dependent vasodilation of isolated coronary arteries from the ischemic region. Farm pigs consumed chow supplemented with atorvastatin (2.5 mg.kg(-1).d(-1); n=6), pravastatin (10 (n=3) or 20 (n=2) mg.kg(-1).d(-1)), simvastatin (5 mg.kg(-1).d(-1); n=6), or no statin (control; n=6) for 3 weeks. Animals were anesthetized and instrumented to measure regional (% segment shortening) and global (dP/dt max) left ventricular (LV) function during coronary artery occlusion (10 min) and reperfusion (30 min). Coronary resistance (i.d. = 119 +/- 3 microm) and conductance (i.d. = 487 +/- 11 microm) arteries were isolated from the ischemic region to measure receptor-dependent (acetylcholine (ACh)) and -independent (KCl) vasoconstriction, and endothelium-dependent (bradykinin (BK)) and -independent (sodium nitroprusside (SNP)) vasodilation. At 30 min reperfusion, neither percent recovery of regional ventricular function (atorvastatin, 24% +/- 15%; pravastatin, 36% +/- 13%; simvastatin, 29% +/- 13%; control, 36% +/- 13%) nor percent recovery of global LV cardiac function differed among groups. However, BK-induced vasorelaxation of coronary conductance vessels was greater (P<0.05) in statins versus controls, and ACh-induced vasoconstriction was less in simvastatin-treated animals, suggesting the potential for enhanced coronary arterial blood flow to the jeopardized region. In conclusion, our data suggest that ischemia-induced myocardial stunning is similar among pigs treated for 3 weeks with atorvastatin, pravastatin, or simvastatin, even though statin treatment appears to augment endothelium-dependent vasodilation of conductance, but not resistance, vessels subjected to ischemia-reperfusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".