MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016546122 · doi:10.1086/383543

<i>Hubble Space Telescope</i>Observations of the Main Sequence of M4

2004· article· en· W2016546122 on OpenAlexaff
Harvey B. Richer, Gregory G. Fahlman, J. Brewer, S. Davis, J. Kalirai, P. B. Stetson, Bradley M. S. Hansen, R. Michael Rich, Rodrigo Ibata, B. K. Gibson, Michael M. Shara

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of AstrophysicsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsGlobular clusterStarsAdvanced Camera for SurveysAstronomyBlue stragglerWide Field Camera 3Main sequenceProper motionRADIUSCluster (spacecraft)Variable starStar clusterHubble space telescope

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present new results from a photometric study of the main-sequence stars in M4 (NGC 6121= C1620-264), the closest globular cluster to the Sun. Multifield, multiepoch observations at approximately 1, 2, and 6 core radii were obtained with WFPC2 on the Hubble Space Telescope through either the F606W filter or the F555W (V) and F814W (7) filters. The multiepoch observations allowed us to clean the data on the basis of proper motion and thus separate cluster from field stars or extragalactic objects. In all the fields the cluster main sequence can be traced to at least V= 27.0, but there remains a trail of stars to the limit of the data near V= 30 in the deepest outer field, There is no evidence that we have reached the end of the hydrogen-burning main sequence in any of our fields; however, there is some indication that very few stars remain to be detected in the deepest data. A study of the scatter about the cluster main sequence yields a surprisingly small and variable binary fraction:f b ≃ 2% in the inner parts of the cluster, falling to the l% range outside. However, with one possible exception, no stars in the 6 core radius field exhibit photometric variability on timescales of a few hours through a few days. For the currently visible main-sequence stars, the cluster mass function (MF) is very flat (α = 0.1) in the outer field and flattens further in the inner fields, suggesting well-developed mass segregation. The observed variation in the MF is broadly consistent with isotropic, multimass Michie-King models. Because we have a large sample of white dwarfs in the outer field, we are able to show that the cluster IMF above 0.8 M ⊙ was considerably steeper than the present-day MF for low-mass stars. Two appendices are included in this contribution. The first is a detailed discussion of the techniques used to reduce the data, while the second provides a direct comparison between the cluster stars and those belonging to the inner spheroid of the Galaxy. This yields a relative distance between the cluster, d c, and the Galactic center, R o, of R o/d c = 4.36 ± 0.13. With our subdwarf-based estimate of d c = 1.73 ± 0.09 kpc to M4, we find R o = 7.5 7plusmn; 0.6 kpc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207