MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016550788 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2012.6334842

TSM resilient audio watermarking using IMFs

2012· article· en· W2016550788 on OpenAlexaff
Saif alZahir, Md. Wahedul Islam

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital watermarkingWatermarkHilbert–Huang transformComputer scienceAudio signalSIGNAL (programming language)Mode (computer interface)Speech recognitionNoise (video)Audio signal processingArtificial intelligenceWhite noiseSpeech codingImage (mathematics)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With widespread of the Internet as well as the numerous applications that involve audio signals and systems, the issue of ownership proof become imperative. In this paper, we present an audio watermark scheme that is based on Empirical Mode Decomposition and Hilbert Huang Transform. The audio signal is decomposed into several mono-component signals or Intrinsic Mode Functions to serve as the addressee for watermark. The watermark is a pseudo random number which is added to the highest and lowest Intrinsic Mode Functions of the signal to generate what we call the modified IMFs which is in turn added to the remaining IMFs to produce the watermarked signal. Our experimental results show that the proposed method is robust against signal processing attacks such as MP3, time scale modification, resizing, and others. The obtained results meet the recommended imperceptibility signal to noise ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesFrench-language works237,207