MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016575459 · doi:10.7202/041574ar

Le geste théâtral contemporain : entre présentation et symboles

2010· article· fr· W2016575459 on OpenAlex
Jean-Frédéric Chevallier

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueL’Annuaire théâtral Revue québécoise d’études théâtrales · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le théâtre tend à devenir un acte de présentation qui met en jeu des mouvements, des énergies, des impulsions, et non plus tant une fable, un déroulement conflictuel de l’action, un message. L’attention se porte sur la mise en relation de la scène avec la salle. Si l’on décide de regarder d’un oeil d’herméneute ce qui surgit dans cet entre-deux — ou ce que la constitution d’un entre-deux produit —, on parlera de symboles, non pas au sens commun de l’expression (« ceci symbolise cela »), mais dans une perspective plus étymologique : « ceci (le symbole donc) relie celui-ci (tel acteur) avec celui-là (tel spectateur) ». Parler d’un théâtre de présentation et s’attacher à décrire la relation qu’il donne d’établir (de rétablir), c’est souligner la nécessité de penser la pratique théâtrale comme une alternative réelle à la logique mercantile et à la spectacularisation de cette logique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it