MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Automatic Monitoring System for Artificial Hearts Using Self Organizing Map

2001· article· en· W2016619446 on OpenAlex
Xian-Zheng Wang, Makoto Yoshizawa, Akira Tanaka, Ken-ichi Abe, Tomoyuki Yambe, Shin Ichi Nitta, Tsuneo Chinzei, Yusuke Abe, Kou Imachi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueASAIO Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Aging
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSelf-organizing mapArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Learning vector quantizationVector quantizationSupport vector machineArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents an automatic monitoring system for artificial hearts. The self organizing map (SOM) was applied to monitoring and analysis of an aortic pressure (AoP) signal measured from an adult goat equipped with a total artificial heart. In the proposed system, two different SOMs were used to detect and classify abnormalities in the measured AoP signal. In the first stage, an ordinary SOM, taught with only normal AoP data, was used for detection of abnormalities on the basis of the quantization error in the real-time monitoring task. In the second stage, a supervised SOM was used for classification of abnormalities. The supervised SOM can be regarded as an ordinary SOM with an extra class vector for solving the classification problem. The class vector is assigned to every node in the second SOM as an output weight learned according to Kohonen's learning rule. The effectiveness of detection and classification of abnormalities using these two SOMs was confirmed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it