Neonatal group B streptococcal disease: Incidence, presentation, and mortality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the incidence, and compare the clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, and immediate mortality of neonates with early-onset (symptomatic and asymptomatic) and late-onset group B streptococcal (GBS) disease. METHODS: A chart review of 81 neonates with GBS disease (either blood and/or cerebrospinal fluid culture-proven) born between 1995 and 2002 admitted to two tertiary care perinatal centers in Toronto was conducted. Clinical characteristics were compared for (1) asymptomatic early-onset, symptomatic early-onset, and late-onset GBS disease and (2) survivors and non-survivors. RESULTS: The incidence of GBS disease was 1.13/1000 live births. One or more antepartum or intrapartum predisposing factors were recognized in 62% of cases. Early-onset was noted in 65 (80%) neonates (23 asymptomatic and 42 symptomatic). All full-term infants survived. The mortality was 6% and was confined to preterm neonates with early symptomatic disease who presented with shock and had thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: Antepartum or intrapartum known predisposing risk factors of GBS disease were lacking in one third of patients. Patients who died were preterm infants in the early symptomatic group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".