MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016645936 · doi:10.1080/03052150412331335801

Modelling and optimization of a multistage flash desalination process

2005· article· en· W2016645936 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Optimization · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkDesalinationProcess (computing)BackpropagationComputer scienceProcess engineeringEngineeringIndustrial engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The multistage flash (MSF) desalination process is a widespread and vitally important process for satisfying the needs of citizens of arid land such as in the Middle East Countries. MSF processes are large and complex plants, and a number of simplifying assumptions must be used in order to provide first principle models for simulating and predicting their operation. This article describes the development and application of artificial neural networks (ANNs) as a modelling technique for simulating, analyzing, and optimizing MSF processes. Real operational data is obtained from an existing MSF plant during two modes of operation: a summer mode and a winter mode. ANNs based on a feed-forward architecture and trained by the backpropagation algorithm with momentum and a variable learning rate are developed. The networks can predict different plant performance outputs including the distilled water produced and top brine temperature. The inputs to the ANNs are based on engineering know-how of the operation of the plant. The predictions of the prepared networks were compared to actual measurements. Good agreements were obtained. In addition to their use as a training tool for new operators and for decision-making, the prepared networks were used to optimize the performance of the plant. A composite objective function that consists of the different plant performance measures was used in conjunction with the prepared ANNs within an optimization model. The ANN model serves as an accurate and more convenient replacement of first principle models or plant data. The decision variables over which optimization was carried out are subjected to constraints to ensure that maximum and minimum bounds are adhered to as well as safety considerations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it