Performance properties of acrylic and acrylic polyol–polyurethane based hybrid system via addition of nano‐caco<sub>3</sub> and nanoclay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Thermosetting acrylic (TSA) resin was prepared by solution polymerisation of acrylic acid and methyl methacrylate (MMA). Hybrid polymer consisting of acrylic polyol–polyurethane was prepared by addition of hydroxy ethyl acrylate and hexamethylene diisocyanate (HMDI). Incorporation of Functionalised nanocalcium carbonate and bentonite nanoclay were accomplished by in situ method during the synthesis of both the polymers. Loading of nano‐CaCO 3 and nanoclay was varied from 0 to 4 wt.% to investigate variation in mechanical, optical and high performance properties. The superiority of nanoclay in enhancing the mechanical and performance properties like the salt spray and humidity resistance in comparison to that of nano‐CaCO 3 was clearly established. It was also observed that, addition of nanomaterials in hybrid resins system shows superior results compared to neat acrylic system and in situ additions of these nanomaterials improve the dispersion and stability in the matrix.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".