Cognitive dysfunction and antiphospholipid antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nervous system involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is typically diagnosed on the basis of clinical psychiatric and/or neurologic syndromes (NPSLE). Neuropsychological tests can be used to assess nervous system integrity even in the absence of major NP syndromes. Their application has uncovered significant cognitive dysfunction, ranging from mild to severe, in a sizeable proportion of SLE patients irrespective of clinical NP status. Cognitive dysfunction has now been accepted as a bona fide manifestation of NPSLE. The heterogeneity of clinical NPSLE manifestations is paralleled by the diversity of cognitive deficits reported in different studies and within different patients. The success of attempts to explain these deficits on the basis of potential pathogenetic mechanisms, such as antibrain antibodies and proinflammatory cytokines, has been uneven. To date, the most robust findings have emerged in relation to antiphospholipid antibodies, which carry with them important therapeutic implications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".