MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016716094 · doi:10.1139/b05-019

A new species of <i>Harposporium </i>parasitic on nematodes

2005· article· en· W2016716094 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xuan Li, Hong Luo, Ke‐Qin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNematode management and characterization studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsConidiumChlamydosporeBiologySporeBotanyAgarHyphomycetesMicrobiologyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new species, Harposporium thaumasium X. Li et K.Q. Zhang, was isolated from forest soil in Yunnan, China. This species produces small, curved conidia, singly or in groups, from globose or ellipsoid phialides. Unlike other known Harposporium, this species produced novel arthroconidia that did not disarticulate at septa but germinated to produce typical phialides and infective conidia. Solitary or catenulate chlamydospores were also produced within infected nematodes and in pure culture. Narrowly elliptical to D-shaped accessory conidia were produced, only on potato dextrose agar and dextrose yeast agar, from mono- or poly-phialidic conidiogenous cells resembling Hirsutella; thus, on these nutrient media, four different spore types were formed. Infection tests showed that curved conidia of the species were capable of killing bacteria-feeding nematodes (Panagrellus redivivus) when ingested, and the infection was initiated by lodging of the conidia in the gut region. Accessory conidia were not observed to be infective or adhesive.Key words: endoparasitic fungi, Harposporium thaumasium sp.nov., ingested conidia, nematode.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.406
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicNematode management and characterization studiesFrench-language works237,207