Pratiques de bons soins — la maladie d’Alzheimer et la « personne intérieure »
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article vise à problématiser le « mouvement pour la personne » dans le domaine des soins de la maladie d’Alzheimer. L’histoire récente de ce mouvement, lequel viendrait sauver « la personne à l’intérieur », l’inscrit dans une opposition explicite à l’approche biomédicale. On juge que cette dernière nie la personne en mettant l’accent sur la cognition, la rationalité, la réflexivité et l’autonomie. J’avance dans cet article que la notion changeante de personne, dans le domaine des soins de la maladie d’Alzheimer et d’autres formes de démence, prolonge la vie dans la vie, ce qui est relié à la « mort sociale » dont traitent depuis longtemps les sciences sociales. Les pratiques investissant la personne peuvent être comprises comme des négociations culturelles entourant la mort bio-sociale. Ces pratiques reposent sur un sens commun qui n’est pas questionné, et elles ne sont pas exemptes de limites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".