L’autobiographie transgressive : la traversée dans La re-production de Mpoyi-Buatu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les écrivains congolais ne se sont intéressés seulement récemment à la violence de l’histoire coloniale congolaise. La Re-production de Thomas Mpoyi-Buatu s’inscrit dans cet effort de narrativiser l’histoire traumatique congolaise. Le roman de Mpoyi-Buatu revendique la création d’une nouvelle société morale qui pourra briser le cycle douloureux de la violence. Cette nouvelle société n’est possible qu’à travers le rejet du mimétisme et du conformisme. Ce livre récuse toute forme de conformisme empêchant l’autonomie individuelle. La transmutation à réaliser n’est possible, selon l'auteur, qu’à travers des mouvements transversaux qui permettent la création d’un nouvel espace et qui libère l’individu du territoire subjectif modulant les subjectivités des individus selon les intérêts du pouvoir dominant. Ces mouvements transversaux s’effectuent à travers les genres, les styles, les traditions littéraires, et les transgressions sexuelles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".