Does the presence of a seawater gill morphology induced by dietary salt loading affect Cl<sup>−</sup> uptake and acid–base regulation in freshwater rainbow trout <i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of this study was to determine the effect of the changes in gill morphology induced by dietary salt feeding on several aspects of gill function in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss maintained in fresh water with specific emphasis on Cl(-) uptake (J(IN)Cl(-)) and acid-base regulation. The addition of 11% NaCl to the diet caused J(IN)Cl(-) to be reduced by c. 45% from 214·4 ± 26·7 to 117·3 ± 17·4 µmol kg(-1) h(-1) (mean ± s.e.). Rates of Cl(-) efflux (J(OUT)Cl(-)), net Cl(-) flux (J(NET)Cl(-)), J(NET) Na(+) and plasma levels of Na(+) or Cl(-) were unaffected by salt feeding. On the basis of significant effect of the salt diet on decreasing the maximal uptake rate of Cl(-)(J(MAX)Cl(-)), it would appear that internal salt loading caused a decrease in the number of functional ion transport proteins involved in Cl(-) uptake (e.g. Cl(-) -HCO(3)(-) exchangers) and decreased the transporting capacity of existing proteins. The acid-base regulating capacity of control fish and salt-loaded fish was assessed by monitoring arterial blood acid-base status [partial pressure of CO(2) (PCO(2)), pH and HCO(3)(-)] during exposure to external hypercapnia (nominally 7·5 mm Hg). Both groups of fish exhibited typical compensatory responses to sustained hypercapnia consisting of the gradual accumulation of plasma HCO(3) (-) and thus metabolic restoration within 24 h of the initial respiratory acidosis elicited by hypercapnia. Overall, the results demonstrate that while Cl(-) uptake capacity is reduced in salt-fed fish, there is no associated alteration in acid-base regulating capability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".