Hepatitis C Virus Inhibits Intracellular Interferon Alpha Expression in Human Hepatic Cell Lines *
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The chronicity of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection raises the question of how HCV is able to persist in hepatic cells. We show that human primary hepatocytes and human hepatic cell lines (Huh7 and HepG2) spontaneously produce interferon (IFN)-alpha that is inhibited in the HCV replicon cells (Huh.8 and FCA-1). Silencing IFN-alpha gene expression by IFN-alpha small interfering RNA (siRNA) in the HCV replicon cells resulted in increased HCV replicon expression. The activation of IFN-alpha expression by interferon regulatory factor (IRF-7) led to the inhibition of HCV replicon expression, whereas the anti-IFN-alpha receptor antibody could partially block IRF-7-mediated HCV replicon inhibition. In addition, the blockade of IFN-alpha receptor by anti-IFN-alpha receptor antibody on the replicon cells increased HCV replicon expression. Among the HCV nonstructural (NS) proteins tested, NS5A is the most potent inhibitor of IFN-alpha expression by the hepatic cells. Investigation of the mechanism of HCV action on IFN-alpha showed that IRF-7-induced IFN-alpha promoter activation was inhibited in the HCV replicon cells. Furthermore, IRF-7 expression was restricted in the HCV replicon cells. In conclusion, we provide direct evidence that HCV undermines the intracellular innate immunity of the target cells, which may account for HCV persistence in hepatic cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".