MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016828918 · doi:10.1063/1.2823582

Schottky barriers to colloidal quantum dot films

2007· article· en· W2016828918 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchottky barrierRectificationQuantum dotMetal–semiconductor junctionMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsSchottky diodeLeakage (economics)AcceptorNanotechnologyVoltageCondensed matter physicsElectrical engineeringPhysicsDiode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We elucidate experimentally a quantitative physical picture of the Schottky barrier formed at the junction between a metallic contact and a semiconducting colloidal quantum dot film. We used a combination of capacitance-voltage and temperature-dependent current-voltage measurements to extract the key parameters of the junction. Three differently processed Al∕PbS colloidal quantum dot junction devices provide rectification ratios of 104, ideality factors of 1.3, and minimal leakage currents at room temperature. The Schottky barrier height is 0.4eV and the built-in potential 0.3V. The depletion width ranges from 90to150nm and the acceptor density ranges from 2×1016to7×1016cm−3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it