MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016845523 · doi:10.2310/7070.2001.20174

Detection, Evaluation, and Management of Aspiration in Rehabilitation Hospitals: Role of the Otolaryngologist—Head and Neck Surgeon

2001· article· en· W2016845523 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
David E. Eibling, Ricardo L. Carrau

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Otolaryngology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDysphagia Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDysphagiaOtorhinolaryngologyRehabilitationSwallowingAspiration pneumoniaAcute careSpeech-Language PathologyPhysical therapyPneumoniaHealth careSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CONTEXT: Reductions in the length of acute care hospitalizations have resulted in earlier transfer of patients with significant neurologic disease, such as head injury or stroke, to inpatient rehabilitation facilities. In many instances, these patients arrive at the rehabilitation hospital with multiple unresolved acute processes, including undetected or inadequately evaluated dysphagia. These patients may be at significant risk for the development of aspiration pneumonia, especially if elderly or debilitated. OBJECTIVE: To review the role of otolaryngologic consultation in the management of inpatients in two rehabilitation hospitals. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective review of 1046 consultations performed by two otolaryngologists over a 4-year period at two long-term inpatient rehabilitation hospitals in the Pittsburgh, PA, metropolitan area. RESULTS: A total of 833 patients were evaluated. Three hundred were seen for a variety of common disease processes, including hearing loss, and cerumen removal. A total of 548 consultations were for recommendations regarding swallowing dysfunction. Fibre-optic endoscopic examination of swallowing function was performed in 478 patients. Two hundred consultations were for assistance in decannulation of patients who were transferred from the acute care hospital with an indwelling tracheostomy tube. CONCLUSIONS: The detection and evaluation of the aspiration risk of dysphagic patients in rehabilitation hospitals are enhanced by an onsite dysphagia team with access to instrumented measures of swallowing, especially videofluoroscopy or videoendoscopy. Otolaryngologic consultation can provide considerable benefit for many inpatients in rehabilitation hospitals, even those with apparent "minor" dysfunction. The otolaryngologist-head and neck surgeon is uniquely qualified to provide consultation in the management of those inpatients with complex clinical problems involving the upper aerodigestive tract. Consultation may be critical for some patients, assessing the cause and severity of dysphagia and assisting in the safe decannulation of those with indwelling tracheostomy tubes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.239

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of OtolaryngologySame topicDysphagia Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207