Solubility of Two Polymorphs of Erlotinib Hydrochloride in Isopropanol and Acetone from (273.15 to 303.15) K
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work the solubility of two polymorphic forms A and B of erlotinib hydrochloride in isopropanol (IPA) and acetone were determined by means of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in the temperature range from (273.15 to 303.15) K. The experimental data were correlated with the modified Apelblat equation. In particular, the effect of the surfactant Tween 80 on the solubility of both polymorphs was studied as well. The results show that the solubility of both polymorphs generally increases with the temperature, and polymorph A has a higher solubility than polymorph B which indicates that polymorph A is the metastable form. The modified Apelblat equation shows a good agreement with the experimental data with a percent error less than 3 %. Furthermore, the solubility of both polymorphs increases in a linear fashion with increasing the content of Tween 80 in organic solvents, wherein Tween 80 presents a same solubilization capacity to both polymorphs and a higher solubilization capacity in acetone than in IPA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it