MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016891850 · doi:10.1667/rr0591.1

Time-Dependent Neurosphere-Forming Ability of Adult Rat Spinal Cord after Irradiation

2007· article· en· W2016891850 on OpenAlexaff
Fred Lu, C. Shun Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiation Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurosphereSpinal cordIrradiationIn vitroAndrologyBiologyAnatomyMedicineNeuroscienceBiochemistryAdult stem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To determine whether there was evidence for long-term time-dependent changes in neurosphere-forming ability of rat spinal cord after irradiation, a 15-mm length of spinal cord (C2-T2) of 10-week-old female rats was irradiated with a single dose of 2, 5, 10 or 19 Gy. Cells were isolated from the central 10-mm segment of the irradiated spinal cord immediately or at 0.5, 1, 2 or 5 months to form neurospheres. The number and sizes of neurospheres were determined at day 10, 12, 14 and 16 in vitro. The multipotential properties of neurosphere cells were assessed by immunocytochemistry using lineage-specific markers for neurons and glia. In nonirradiated controls, the number and size of the neurospheres decreased with increasing age of the animals. Regardless of the time after irradiation, there was a dose-dependent decrease in the number and size of neurospheres obtained from the irradiated cord compared to age-matched controls. Using three-way ANOVA, the number of neurospheres was dependent on radiation dose (P < 0.0001), time after irradiation (P < 0.0001), and day of counting in vitro (P < 0.0001). Compared to cells cultured immediately after irradiation, there was an increase in the relative plating efficiency of neurospheres cultured 1 month after irradiation. However, no further increase was apparent up to 5 months after irradiation. The multipotential properties of neurosphere cells in vitro remained unchanged with increasing time after irradiation. These results may suggest a time-dependent recovery of radiation damage using neurosphere-forming ability as the end point and agree with data that show time-dependent recovery of radiation damage in spinal cord using histological or functional end points.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiation ResearchSame topicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsFrench-language works237,207