Effect of a magnetic field pulse on ultrafast magnetization reversal in a submicron elliptical Permalloy thin film
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The characteristics of a magnetic field pulse, its magnitude, direction, and rise and fall time on the mechanism of ultrafast magnetization reversal have been studied by micromagnetic simulations. An elliptically shaped, Permalloy thin film, having dimensions of 400nm long axis, 112nm short axis, and 3.2nm, thickness, was considered. A plot of the magnetic field pulse components describes three types of reversal behaviors, quasicoherent, incoherent, and nonreversal. The optimum magnetic field pulse for the suppression of magnetization ringing is found in the incoherent precession area by finding the lowest remanent total energy at the moment the pulse is cut off. The rise and fall time of the pulse has a significant effect on the reversal behavior only in the incoherent precession region. In this region, whether a reversal can occur depends on the rise time of the pulse. Extending the rise and fall time of the pulse, in the noncoherent rotation region, does not lead to a clear change of the remanent total energy but a rise time longer than 50ps does result in a distinct increase in the remanent exchange energy, which enhances the magnetization ringing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".