MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2016963394 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2012-462

Abstract 462: Fer protein-tyrosine kinase promotes lung tumor progression and metastases

2012· article· en· W2016963394 on OpenAlexaff
Joseph Ahn, Peter Truesdell, Alexander H. Boag, Andrew W. Craig

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancer researchBiologyProto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase SrcTyrosine kinaseLung cancerReceptor tyrosine kinaseEpidermal growth factor receptorCancerKinasePathologyMedicineSignal transductionCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract FER is a ubiquitously expressed non-receptor protein-tyrosine kinase implicated in regulating cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, cell growth and migration. Although no activating mutations have been described for FER, recent studies implicate FER as a positive regulator of cancer progression in the prostate and liver. FER is composed of Fer/CIP4 homology-Bin/Amphiphysin/Rvs (F-BAR), extended F-BAR (FX), SH2, and kinase domains. FER oligomerization and membrane targeting is conferred by F-BAR/FX domains, while the SH2 domain allows FER recruitment to tyrosine phosphorylated ligands, including activated Epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR). Since gene amplification or gain-of-function mutations in EGFR are frequently observed in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), we tested whether FER participates in EGFR-driven NSCLC migration, progression, and metastases. Here we show that FER is expressed in normal lung epithelial cells and at variable levels in NSCLC cell lines. In a panel of NSCLC homogenates we observed 5 out of 12 cases of increased FER expression over normal adjacent tissue. Furthermore, in a tissue microarray containing a range of lung cancer histological types we observed high FER expression in the NSCLC adenocarcinoma subtype and in SCLC. In human lung epithelial carcinoma H1299 cells that overexpress wild-type EGFR, we detected rapid EGF-induced activation of FER, and subsequent phosphorylation of several putative FER substrates including STAT3, Cortactin, and Vav2. To probe the function of FER, we used a lentiviral shRNA system to achieve stable knock-down (KD) of FER in H1299 cells. Compared to control cells, FER KD cells displayed a significant reduction in EGF-induced migration in scrape wound assays. FER KD cells were also defective in frequency and velocity of invasion under an agarose drop containing EGF. Of the putative FER substrates tested, we observed a significant decrease in Vav2 phosphorylation in Fer KD cells. Since Vav2 promotes Rac activation, we compared localization of active, GTP-bound Rac1 in control and FER KD cells treated with EGF. Interestingly, FER promotes localization of GTP-Rac1 to the leading edge of these cells. To test the role of FER in NSCLC progression and metastasis, H1299 vector control and FER KD cells were grown as subcutaneous tumors in immune compromised mice (Rag2-/-γc-/-) for four weeks. Although we observed no significant differences in tumor mass for FER KD cells compared to control, the potential role of FER in metastasis is currently under investigation. Together, this study may implicate FER as a viable new therapeutic target for treatment of EGFR-driven metastasis of lung cancers. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 462. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-462

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research→French-language works237,207→