MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016995256 · doi:10.1109/acc.2014.6859231

Optimal control of microgrids - algorithms and field implementation

2014· article· en· W2016995256 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emrah Bıyık, R.S. Chandra

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalabilityComputer scienceMicrogridMathematical optimizationField (mathematics)Dynamic programmingEconomic dispatchKnapsack problemLinear programmingOptimal controlAlgorithmControl (management)Electric power systemMathematicsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A microgrid is a collection of distributed generation assets, storage devices and electrical and/or thermal loads connected to each other. In this paper, a generic model-predictive control algorithm for microgrids is presented. The algorithm has been implemented at Bella Coola, a remote community in British Columbia, Canada. The approach comprises two parts: unit commitment to decide the optimal set of distributed generators that must be switched on to meet predicted load requirements, and convex optimal control to minimize operational costs once the commitment is known. The unit commitment problem is recast as a 0–1 Knapsack problem and is solved via dynamic programming, while the optimal dispatch problem is posed as a sparse linear programming problem and solved via off-the-shelf software. Worst-case complexity and scalability considerations, and not optimality, often drive algorithm choice in industrial control settings; therefore, the solution proposed in this paper is efficient and can be rigorously bounded in terms of memory and run-time. Simulation results using real field data, practical considerations, and details of the implementation at Bella Coola are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score0.200

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207