MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017001345 · doi:10.1159/000243533

Oxygen Saturation during Sleep in Patients with Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

2009· article· en· W2017001345 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of the Neonate · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBronchopulmonary dysplasiaAnesthesiaMedicineSaturation (graph theory)Oxygen saturationSupplemental oxygenRoom air distributionOxygenGestational ageChemistryBiologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We hypothesized that significant sleep desaturation might occur in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia whose awake saturations were between 90 and 92%. Supplemental oxygen was continued until the awake saturation on room air was 90% or greater. Sleep saturations were monitored by oximetry sampling for a 3-min period every hour overnight. Significant desaturation was considered to be present if the saturation fell repeatedly below 88%. There were 39 studies performed in room air, and 14 studies in supplemental oxygen. We demonstrated that patients with acceptable awake saturation may desaturate while sleeping. However, only 1 of 25 patients whose saturation in room air was 92% or more repeatedly desaturated during sleep.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it