MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017017495 · doi:10.1021/ma0002702

Electrophoresis of Composite Molecular Objects. 1. Relation between Friction, Charge, and Ionic Strength in Free Solution

2000· article· en· W2017017495 on OpenAlexafffund
Claude Desruisseaux, Didier Long, Guy Drouin, Gary W. Slater

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsIonic strengthElectrophoresisCapillary electrophoresisChemistryPersistence lengthStreptavidinPolyelectrolyteChemical physicsIonic bondingBuffer (optical fiber)Analytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyAqueous solutionPolymerPhysical chemistryIonOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a study of the mobility of streptavidin end-labeled ssDNA fragments in free solution capillary electrophoresis. Our data show that the contribution of the uncharged streptavidin label to the net electrophoretic mobility of the complex depends on the buffer ionic strength because this frictional contribution is actually related to the persistence length of the ssDNA fragment. Therefore, the ionic strength of the buffer affects both the free-solution mobility of naked ssDNA and the effective slowing down (or “drag”) due to the streptavidin label. We further show that our experimental results can be interpreted using recently published polyelectrolyte electrophoresis theories. Our results thus confirm that the so-called free-draining picture of local ssDNA electrophoretic friction and charge is not valid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207