Relative Permeability Estimation from Displacement Experiments Using EnKF Method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The relative permeability is a crucial parameter for accurately evaluating reservoir performance. Two-phase relative permeability curves are normally obtained by either directly or indirectly interpreting the displacement experiment data. As for the direct interpretation, the core samples are assumed to be homogeneous, while the capillary forces are normally neglected. Although the indirect interpreting approach is able to take heterogeneity of the core sample into account, calculating the derivatives of the objective functions through the graphical or numerical methods is prone to considerable errors. In this paper, a new method is developed to calculate the absolute and relative permeability from unsteady-state, two-phase immiscible displacement experiments. The permeability data is determined by history matching the experimentally observed pressure drop, production data and water saturation profiles via the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) algorithm. The power-law model is utilized to represent the relative permeability. Both the absolute and relative permeability are calculated simultaneously by assimilating the observed data. The newly developed method is validated using a numerical coreflooding experiment. It has been found that estimations of absolute and relative permeability are improved progressively as more observation data are assimilated. In addition, this method is convenient to be implemented as the derivative of the objective function is not required.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it