MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017031653 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2013.6572415

A low power all-digital self-calibrated temperature sensor using 65nm FPGAs

2013· article· en· W2017031653 on OpenAlexaff
Shuang Xie, Wai Tung Ng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceField-programmable gate arrayOverhead (engineering)CalibrationPower (physics)Electronic engineeringLogic gateProcess (computing)Low-power electronicsEmbedded systemReal-time computingPower consumptionEngineeringAlgorithmPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an all-digital self-calibrated delay-line based temperature sensor. A continuous self-calibration technique is proposed to remove process variations and to generate direct digital representations of temperature. A power saving scheme using a hybrid counter/pulse position decoder is also introduced without any increase in area overhead. Four different architectures including traditional long and short delay-lines, and the proposed power saving hybrid sensor with long and short delay-lines are implemented on multiple 65nm Cyclone III FPGAs along with an on-chip continuous self-calibration circuit. The logic utilization for a single sensor is as small as 60 Logic Elements (LE) and its measured power consumption is as low as 2.9 μW, with errors less than ±1.6°C from 20°C to 75°C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207