Morning Plasma Aldosterone Predicts the Subtype of Primary Aldosteronism Independant of Sodium Intake
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to assess the potential predictive value of supine morning plasma aldosterone concentration, a component of the postural stimulation test (PST), in distinguishing aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) from idiopathic adrenal hyperplasia (IAH) in a series of 61 patients with confirmed primary aldosteronism (PAL). The reproducibility of the PST was also tested under conditions of both normal- and high-sodium intake. Twenty-seven patients had surgery-confirmed unique APA. Thirty-four patients were classified as IAH and treated medically. Morning plasma aldosterone values were significantly higher in patients with APA compared to those with IAH (p < 0.01) on both diets. Using the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, it was observed that the cutoff values in the highest (>900 pmol/L or 32 ng/dl) and lowest (<300 pmol/L or 11 ng/dl) range of the morning plasma aldosterone measurements were predictive of the subtype diagnosis in about 50% of PAL cases (31 of 61 patients). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the PST were >70% on both sodium diets. The PST was also reproducible irrespective of sodium intake. Moreover, one of its components, the supine morning plasma aldosterone, can be used as an indicator for the subtype diagnosis in about half of PAL patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it