Flux Characteristics of Oil Separation from O/W Emulsions using Highly Hydrophilic UF Membrane in Narrow Channel
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Flux characteristics of oil separation from O/W emulsions using highly hydrophilic polymeric UF membrane has been investigated. The effect of using sub-millimeter filtration channel on both unsteady and steady state permeate flux is evaluated. The time-dependent flux characteristics indicated that membrane fouling has proceeded mainly according to the intermediate pore blocking mechanism modified for crossflow filtration. The steady state flux increased initially with the transmembrane pressure (TMP), then reached a plateau at a relatively low TMP of ∼15 kPa, beyond which a steady operation was achieved, and there were practically no advantages of increasing the TMP. The pressure independent limiting flux increased with increasing the crossflow velocity and was found to scale with the membrane surface shear rate to the power of 0.35. The data were modeled satisfactorily using a dimensionally consistent semi-empirical model with R2 value of 0.96.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it