MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017121983 · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.01.012

Utilization of a national network for rapid response to the Medtronic Fidelis lead advisory: The Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee

2009· article· en· W2017121983 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Andrew D. Krahn, Christopher S. Simpson, Ratika Parkash, Raymond Yee, Jean Champagne, Jeff S. Healey, Doug Cameron, Bernard Thibault, Iqwal Mangat, Stanley Tung, Laurence D. Sterns, David Birnie, Derek V. Exner, Soori Sivakumaran, Ted Davies, Benoit Coutu, Eugene Crystal, Kevin Wolfe, Atul Verma, Elizabeth A. Stephenson, Shubhayan Sanatani, Robert M. Gow, Sean P. Connors, Michael Turabian, Teresa Kuś, Martin Gardner, Vidal Essebag

Bibliographic record

VenueHeart Rhythm · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
FundersHospital for Sick ChildrenInstitut de Cardiologie de MontréalQueen's UniversityUniversity of AlbertaMcGill University Health CentreHamilton Health SciencesBC Children's HospitalUniversity of OttawaMcGill UniversityHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsAdvisory committeeMedicineImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorHeart RhythmMedical emergencyEthics committeeFamily medicineCardiologyManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.044
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.095
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score0.495

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0440.095
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueHeart RhythmSame topicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesFrench-language works237,207