Le phytomanagement, protection et dépollution des eaux et des sols : un état des connaissances et des pratiques en France
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le phytomanagement englobe les techniques de génie végétal dédiées à la protection et la dépollution des eaux et des sols. La fonction de protection est assurée par la gestion forestière des bassins d’alimentation des masses d’eaux, du point de vue sanitaire par le boisement de périmètres de captage, assorti de règles de bonnes pratiques sylvicoles. La ripisylve est un puissant filtre végétal où le sol joue un rôle important de fixation et de dissipation de polluants. Le rôle de la forêt linéaire est plus nuancé et dépend de la situation dans le bassin versant, de l’orientation et de la morphologie des structures boisées. La phytoremédiation, par tradition associée aux sites anthropiques — notamment industriels —, recouvre un ensemble de techniques de restauration de sols et de sites pollués, basées sur la fixation, la dégradation ou la concentration (préliminaire à l’exportation) de substances toxiques. Contrairement à la situation des États- Unis et du Canada, la plupart de ces techniques relèvent en Europe encore majoritairement de la recherche et ne sont pas encore opérationnelles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".