Phosphine chalcogenide complexes of antimony(III) halides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three series of phosphine chalcogenide complexes of the antimony(III) halides SbX3 (X = F, Cl, Br, or I) have been synthesized and characterized by spectroscopic and crystallographic methods. Complexes of the generic formulae (Cy3PO)SbX3 (X = F (1a), Cl (1b), or Br (1c)), (Cy3PO)2SbX3 (X = F (2a), Cl (2b), or Br (2c)), and (Cy3PS)SbX3 (X = Cl (3b), Br (3c), or I (3d)) were synthesized via the treatment of solutions of SbX3 with OPCy3 and SPCy3, respectively. Derivatives of (Cy3PO)SbX3 were characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction for 1a and 1b and crystallize as dimers through symmetry related intermolecular Sb–X interactions, providing the first structurally characterized examples of this class of complex. Derivatives of (Cy3PS)SbX3 (3b–3c) adopt analogous dimeric structures in the solid state. The solid-state structure of (Cy3PO)2SbCl3 (2b) is consistent with the previously reported structures of bis-phosphine oxide complexes of antimony(III), with a square pyramidal Sb center and cis-configured OPCy3 ligands. The phosphine chalcogenide complexes of SbX3 display configurations that are consistent with the perceived trans-labilizing properties of the ligands/substituents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".