MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017173228 · doi:10.1063/1.4912676

Microstructural computational modelling of soft tissues

2015· article· en· W2017173228 on OpenAlexaff
Aleksandar Tomić, Alfio Grillo, Salvatore Federico

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Material Mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMesoscopic physicsMaterials sciencePermeability (electromagnetism)Composite materialFinite element methodDeformation (meteorology)Porous mediumCompression (physics)PorosityStructural engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work we numerically implement a previously developed large deformation model for porous fibre-reinforced materials with statistically oriented fibres, including the effect of the presence of the fibres on both the elastic properties and the permeability. The model is microstructural, based on observations made at different length-scales: the microscopic scale of the porous matrix, the mesoscopic scale of the reinforcing fibres, and the macroscopic scale of the system as a whole, and makes use of upscaling techniques. The implementation makes use of the open-source Finite Element package FEBio, which allows for full customisation of the constitutive equations. We first study a benchmark test in which only the effect of the fibre orientation on the permeability is accounted for. Then we simulate an unconfined compression test on a sample of articular cartilage, with realistic histological features, such as the volumetric fractions of the matrix and collagen fibres and fibre orientation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.681
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicComposite Material MechanicsFrench-language works237,207