Study on Removal of Iron and Manganese from Mine Water by Method of Medicament
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Use single and coexistence of simulated mine water contains Fe2+ and Mn2+ as processing object, the new NWMO medicament on Fe2+ and Mn2+’s removal efficiency, NWMO dosage, pH, reaction time and temperature on NWMO’s removal efficiency were investigated. When treated mine water only contains Fe2+, the appropriate conditions of the factors are that NWMO dosage/Fe2+ content=19:1, pH=5, room temperature, the reaction time is 10min, and the removal rate of Fe2+ is more than 80%; When treated mine water only contains Mn2+, the appropriate conditions of the factors are that NWMO dosage/Mn2+ content=22:1, pH=6, 35°C, the reaction time is 10min, the removal rate of Mn2+ is more than 60%; When the processing of Fe2+ and Mn2+ coexistence of mine water, the appropriate conditions of the factors are that NWMO dosage/Fe2+content=19:1, Fe2+ content/Mn2+ content=5:1, pH=6, 35°C, the reaction time is 10min, the removal rate of Fe2+ can be as high as 100%, and the highest Mn2+ removal rate can amount to 75%. In view of the current mine water quality characteristics that contains Fe2+ and Mn2+, the NWMO medicament is very suitable, and can achieve quick and efficient removal of iron and manganese.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".