MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017178289 · doi:10.1103/physreve.74.051902

Complex movements of motor protein relay helices during the power stroke

2006· article· en· W2017178289 on OpenAlexfundno aff
M. V. Satarić, Leif Matsson, Jack A. Tuszyński

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersZentrum für interdisziplinäre Forschung, Universität BielefeldUniversität BielefeldUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsSolitonRelayFormalism (music)PhysicsStroke (engine)Power (physics)Statistical physicsComputer scienceClassical mechanicsNonlinear systemQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We use the Toda soliton formalism to propose a possible complex movement of alpha helices with a very important role in energy transduction during the power stroke of motor proteins. We find that this approach has advantages in comparison with the Davydov soliton model and its variants. We estimated the model's parameters and calculated corresponding properties of the predicted solitary waves including propagation velocities and energies. The energies are found to be within the expected range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ESame topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsFrench-language works237,207