MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017199159 · doi:10.5380/geo.v55i0.4283

MAPA LITOESTRATIGRÁFICO DA PARTE ORIENTAL DA BACIA BAURU (PR, SP, MG), ESCALA 1:1.000.000

2004· article· pt· W2017199159 on OpenAlexaff
Luiz Alberto Fernandes

Bibliographic record

VenueBoletim Paranaense de Geociências · 2004
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGeography and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCretaceousGeologyStructural basinGeomorphologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Bacia Bauru é uma bacia continental interior do Neocretáceo (Coniaciano-Maastrichtiano), desenvolvida no centro-sul da Plataforma Sul-Americana. Acumulou uma seqüência sedimentar essencialmente arenosa, que ocorre em área de cerca de 370.000 km2. Tem por substrato rochas vulcânicas, sobretudo basaltos da Formação Serra Geral (Cretáceo Inferior). A área do mapa corresponde à parte oriental da bacia, com cerca de 180.000 km2. A seqüência neocretácea é composta por dois grupos cronocorrelatos: Caiuá (formações Rio Paraná, Goio Erê e Santo Anastácio) e Bauru (formações Uberaba, Vale do Rio do Peixe, Araçatuba, São José do Rio Preto, Presidente Prudente e Marília, incluindo os Analcimitos Taiúva). LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC MAP OF THE BAURU BASIN EASTERN PART (PR, SP, MG), SCALE 1:1.000.000 Extended Abstract The Bauru Basin is a Late Cretaceous (Coniacian-Maastrichtian) interior continental basin developed as a result of subsidence of the central-southern part of the South-American Platform. It spreads over an area of approximately 370,000 km2 and is filled by a sandy sequence with a preserved maximum thickness of 300 meters. The substratum is made up of volcanic rocks (mainly basalts) of the Serra Geral Formation (Early Cretaceous). The map area corresponds to the eastern part of the basin, with about 180,000 km2 (west of São Paulo, southwest of Minas Gerais, northwest of Paraná), located between the coordinates 18°S to 25° S and 47° W to 54° W (Figure 1). The Upper Cretaceous sequence is composed by two partially contemporaneous groups (Figure 2): Caiuá (Rio Paraná, Goio Erê and Santo Anastácio formations) and Bauru (Uberaba, Vale do Rio do Peixe, Araçatuba, São José do Rio Preto, Presidente Prudente, and Marília formations, including the Taiúva analcimites). The intensification of the tectonic activities at the north-northeastern and eastern margins, and probably also at the northwestern margin, caused significant changes in the paleogeographic scenario, promoting progradation of alluvial fans. At the same time, climatic changes increased the humidity in the marginal zones. These changes mark the beginning of the sedimentary phase during which important fluvial systems from northeast to southwest were established between the marginal zone and the inland Caiuá Desert. During the uplift of the margins, the intrusion of several alkaline magmatic bodies cause extrusive magmatism near the eastern border (Taiúva analcimites), as well as localized silicification in the southern border. All known fossil occurrences are located in the eastern part of the basin and were paleogeographically controlled. They comprise bone remains, mainly from reptiles -crocodiles, turtles, dinossaurs -, as well as amphibians, fishes, mollusks, crustaceans, and oogones of charophytic algae. The main occurrences are from fluvial flood plain deposits and ephemeral lagoons in the interior of the basin, as well as from those of braided water flows and lagoons located in zones of marginal alluvial fans. In the interior of the basin the hot desertic condition prevailed during the two phases of sedimentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBoletim Paranaense de GeociênciasSame topicGeography and Environmental StudiesFrench-language works237,207