Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Violence and human rights violations in putatively internal armed conflicts often involve significant cross-border dimensions. Yet the transitional justice mechanisms that respond to past atrocities have generally been undertaken in national or international institutions and focus primarily on offenses within a single state and primarily by national actors of that state. Despite the proliferation of transitional justice mechanisms, they have generally not been designed or utilized to address transboundary or regionalized abuses. The result has been significant inconsistencies in practice, with some crimes addressed and others ignored, creating zones of impunity. In this article, we explore the relative absence of regional transitional justice mechanisms, and consider how regional approaches have been used to promote conflict resolution and might be used to shape accountability processes as well. Drawing on the experiences of Central America and the Democratic Republic of Congo, we argue that the potential for regional approaches is as yet untested but merits closer consideration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it